Saturday, August 16, 2014

Simple Justice Through Transparency

Many people have lost money they paid to Charles Lincoln for services which failed to solve the problems they faced.  He has failed to read and understand cases he was paid to handle and asked others to write legal papers they were not qualified to produce. 
Since nothing in life is guaranteed, especially when you go into court, this would not necessarily be cause for complaint except that Lincoln consistently illustrates patterns which make success in court impossible for him to provide to clients and those who work with him.  

These behaviors may stem from a traumatic brain injury Charles suffered in the 1990s, but if this is the case he needs to seek rehabilitation, which is available through Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy, one of the best facilities in the world is located in New Orleans.  

Harch Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy. 

 The Family Physicians' Center
5216 Lapalco Blvd.
Marrero, LA 70072 Monday - Friday 9am to 4pm CT
504 348-4357


It is one thing to fail.  It is another to extract money under false pretenses.  Charles' habits drive the outcome of his practice and these he cannot, or will not, change. 
  
These habits include an initial agreement for a one time payment followed by increasingly angry demands for more money.  Charles knows his clients cannot afford more.  Often the first payment, which they believe will cover the service, nearly bankrupts them, leaving them grasping at disappearing hope.  
Also reported by those who used Lincoln's services, or worked with him was theft of property, attempts to abuse real estate trusted to him and the extended use of apartments without payment.
Lincoln also habitually rewrites verbal agreements and then explodes in anger when he is questioned.
Lincoln accepts money, intended to pay for the services necessary to his work and fails to budget for expenses from these funds received.  He then ignores his obligation to pay those who work with him,  lying about funds received.
He also fails to provide itemized statements to clients or provide such information to those working with him and does not meet the legal requirements to report funds received to the IRS when he has agreed to do so. 
This site is not here to encourage former clients to sue Charles, though we know some are.  It is here to warn those looking for help to look elsewhere and also confront Charles with the reality he is creating for himself.  

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

Michael Mastoris's Experience with Charles Lincoln


Michael Mastoris first met Charles at the end of 2008, through Robert Ponte, who, with Bob Riverneider, his partner, was handling an investment for him. At the time, Michael understood that Charles and Ponte were setting up a company to help people who were having the same kind of problems he was experiencing with paying on a loan which had been reasonable when the economy was on the up tick. But this had changed and Michael had suffered reverses economically.

One of the things which was going right for Michael at the time he retained Charles was his investments with Ponte, this gave Michael a degree of trust which he later realized was unjustified.

Although the start up company never materialized Michael was facing foreclosure on his shore house, which he had owned for over twenty-five years.

Charles seemed confident, outlining his background and degrees, exuding a cocky assurance when he talked about the steps they needed to take immediately to save the house from foreclosure. Michael wrote him a check for $4,000 toward what would be a total of $10,000 for the shore house immediately.

Now, Charles explained the steps they would need to take to save the house. This included an assignment of rights to Lincoln and a Mastoris Trust.  The Trust would, Lincoln told Mastoris,  ensure Michael's control over his home, leaving Mastoris in control of  and all decisions.

Peyton Frieman, who worked for Charles, flew to New Jersey to complete the paperwork. Immediately completing the assignment of rights. Later, Peyton also provided Mastoris with a copy of the draft Mastoris Trust. Although Michael asked about when this would be completed Charles always put him off.  

The Mastoris Trust Agreement was never finished and filed, as had been agreed.  This was entirely due to Lincoln's failure to carry out their original agreement.  

But after Charles filed papers the foreclosure stopped. Charles asserted Mastoris his work was responsible for this. Now Michael understands the delay by Bank United on foreclosing stemmed from his loan being out of state.   Overwhelmed with foreclosures in Florida alone, where they were located, BU  did not follow through on their out of state loans for several years.

It was only years later Michael discovered the real reason the foreclosure stopped.

In the meantime, in April, 2012, Michael began experiencing the same problems with his primary home. Believing Charles had proven his ability, he again trusted Charles to take care of his primary residence.

Again, Michael paid Charles $10,000. However, Charles kept demanding more money. Fearful and frantic to keep his home, Michael began sending Charles $1,000 a week, believing this money would be used to pay any further expenses related to saving his home, as is the usual practice in the legal profession.

Mastoris' requests for statements detailing expenses related to his case were frequently made and never provided. 

Later, it became clear Charles follows a practice of spending every penny he gets immediately on himself, never retaining money for its intended use or accounting for funds he receives.  

Only later did Mastoris learn about Lincoln's spending habits. 

In making regular payments while Charles was not actively working on his case Michael thought he was covering future expenses, paying in to a fund to be used when it was needed.  This belief rose out of the fact Charles had told him all he was required to pay was $10,000 when Lincoln's work began.  

For a year Charles managed to get delays on foreclosure for the Mastoris home.  But  after one year, in January of 2014, Michael had to hire a licensed attorney from New Jersey when he learned a Sheriff's sale had been scheduled on his home. 

None of the work Charles did had worked but he claimed Mastoris had not paid him for expenses.  This was the first inkling Mastoris had that something was very skewed in Charles' approach to his business. 

Mastoris asked, again, for an accounting.  The responses from Charles deepened Mastoris' concerns. 

Not only did Charles again fail to account for the money already paid, he told an astonished Mastoris he was responsible for all the expenses for Charles' legal practice, which included other clients.  

From April until May 2012 Mastoris had never missed giving Charles money. Charles received between $45,000 and $55,000 in funds to be used for work on the main house.

In the meantime, Charles continually told him he, Charles, was undervalued and needed more clients. Believing Charles, Michael tried to find him more clients but was shocked to discover how Charles treated them. 

One wealthy acquaintance of Mastoris was initially willing to give Charles a retainer of $25,000. Charles demanded $100,000 for work he normally charged less than $25,000 to complete.

Michael introduced Charles to a friend of his, Peter Milano, who was having problems with his home as well. Instead of handling the house Charles signed Peter up to do a collection on an outstanding debt of $25,000, charging Peter $10,000 and then demanding he, Charles, receive 90% of any money received.

While the case was being litigated Peter was informed by the judge he could have handled this himself at no cost.  (Peter's story will soon link here.) 

Hearing this, Mastoris recalled the many times Charles had attempted to persuade him to file yet another lawsuit.  Others also reported this happening with Charles.  

At the end of 2013 Mastoris retained his present attorney, realizing if he stuck with Charles he would lose the house.

Now paying another attorney and having vastly over paid Charles, Michael cut back on what he was sending Charles every week. Mastoris actually should have stopped paying him entirely, he now realizes.  

Even though Charles knew perfectly well he was no longer employed by Michael he complained continually, demanding Michael pay him the same amount the attorney defending his main residence was receiving. 

Unasked, Charles began sending legal opinions and suggestions to Mastoris' retained attorney. Mastoris commented Charles always wanted to be involved, even when he was entirely unnecessary.  None of the papers sent by Lincoln were read because Mastoris' attorney was well aware of Lincoln's reputation. 

Despite this, Mastoris continued these smaller payments until mid May, 2014 out of a sense of compassion for someone he had been working with for several years.  

Then, Charles decided to steal the shore house using the assignment of rights from their original agreement for which he, Charles, had never finished by filing the Mastoris Trust Agreement.  

Charles appears to believe this would be acceptable to the court, although Mastoris has, in his possession, a copy of the draft Mastoris Trust Agreement which would have made the theft by Lincoln impossible. 

Now more completely considering Lincoln's previous actions Mastoris revisited assertions Charles had made to him.  

Mastoris had noticed over the years he and Charles had a propensity to assume money would come to him from any and all  projects he was undertaking.  This was true even when Charles had nothing to do with such ventures.  This was true of a building project in New Jersey, and other projects. 

Charles gave a forewarning of his intention to use his failure to finish the Mastoris Trust in an email sent to Mastoris May 14, 2014.  This took place two days after Mastoris again sent Charles money.  

Abusing the use of the Power of Attorney provided originally had changed months earlier though Mastoris was unaware this was happening.  

Lincoln used the argument Mastoris had authorized opening a Westlaw account, for which Charles ran up a bill of $18,000 along with  other expenses.  In fact, Mastoris knew nothing about the Westlaw account.  Charles opened it using the power of attorney  Mastoris had given him, never mentioning this to Mastoris. 

An examination of the Westlaw Account would show Charles was using Westlaw for all of his legal work while clearly expecting Mastoris to pay these costs in their entirety.  

During the time Charles had the case in his hands Charles always told Mastoris he controlled the house and could make all decisions relating to it and its use. Mastoris believed him.  

 Mastoris had paid to maintain the house and paid all fees related to its use as a matter of course.  

The last time he paid Charles was one week before Memorial Day, about the 12th of May. Soon after that date, via email dated May 14th,  Mastoris was informed he was no longer welcome in his own house. 

 On Memorial Day Weekend, a time he and his sons had always spent at the shore house, the boys were forced to leave when they arrived to spend the weekend, as usual, with their friends.

Charles was looking for a renter but was unwilling to do any maintenance. He found renters, but not the kind of people Michael's neighbors were used to having around, causing Mastoris more problems.

During this time Mastoris learned Charles, who had been staying with an acquaintance in New York City, had been forced to move out because Michael Santomauro, who was renting the apartment, had decided to move out.  

Santomauro had left the apartment, returning to his home in North Carolina.  He allowed Charles to remain there for what he understood would be a short visit.  

While the movers were packing, Santomauro later learned, Charles continually took books and other items out of their hands, claiming these belonged to him.   When his furniture and possessions from the apartment in New York arrived in North Carolina Santomauro immediately realized much was missing.  

He learned from the movers what had taken place.  At about this time the missing items turned up in the Mastoris Shore House.  Lincoln had gone there when he was left homeless in New York taking with him multiple bags of items evidently removed from the Santomauro apartment.

Mastoris' long-time agent, Candace Kennedy, went into the shore house, around June 20, 2014,  after Lincoln left to stay with a client in Florida, William Todd Overcash.  Candace photographed the piles of books and other items littering the place and texted the images to Santomauro, having learned about what was happening from Mastoris. 

Informed of the whereabouts of his property Santomauro asked Mastoris to pack these up and return them to him, which Mastoris did.  Since Santomauro purchases all of his books online through Amazon he can account for each one of these and for the other items removed from his New York apartment by Lincoln.  

Mastoris asked Santomauro contact the local police to ensure there was no legal issue in his   going to the shore house to retrieve Santomauro's possessions.   Santomauro did so and kept Mastoris updated via texted messages.  TEXT - June 13 & 16, 2014.

On July 14th Charles sends an email to Mastoris and his attorney telling them he now has, "a permanent agent of my own in New Jersey now, Ms. Lynn Kennedy." 

Charles apparently believes he will prevail in court and be able to keep the house for himself. It was his failing to file the Mastoris Trust which made this possible. 

Peyton Freiman was working for Charles when he flew to New Jersey and wrote, at Charles' orders, the draft.  Peyton, with Mastoris, expected Lincoln to finish and file it, giving Mastoris control over his own property.

In this letter Lincoln continues to believe Mastoris, who now understands what really happened, would be willing to pay him for more work.  This may be a further evidence of his previous brain injury.

More evidence of his irrationality is seen in this statement from the same July 14th E-mail. "
Of course, you would have to return the outdoor Grill AND MY COLLECTION OF WORLD WAR II BOOKS which Michael broke in, burgled, stole…. just a couple of weeks ago, last month."

Charles was well aware the grill belonged to the two Mastoris sons, not Mastoris.  

The cited collection of World War II books was removed from the apartment of Michael Santomauro and were his possessions. 

Charles arrived in New York with no funds, which is why he begged a place to stay from Santomauro.  He had in his possession one bag, filled with his clothing and other necessities, according to Santomauro.  But he left the apartment with many bags.  These were transported to the shore house by Lynn Kennedy, his agent.

Mastoris entered the shore house his own key, which he had had for over 30 years. This entry had been cleared by the police in advance.  

The irrationality exhibited by Lincoln is daunting.   

  
On June 15 - 16, 2014, there was an exchange of texts between Santomauro and Charles.  Santomauro texted Charles with the photo of one of the Belstaff bags which had disappeared from his apartment in New York.  Charles responded, denying knowing anything about it. 

It would be interesting to read the response in deposition from Lynn Kennedy as to what she transported, how much there was and how it was packaged.  She may also be aware of the contents.  

The next day Santomauro texted Melinda commenting on his missing books and other possessions having been located in the short house.   TEXT - June 17, 2014 - From Santomauro to Melinda 

The books and other items were transported to Mastoris' home, which is around 45 minutes away from the shore house.  There, they were packed up so they could be shipped to Santomauro in North Carolina.   If Charles wants to make a police report on this, he is welcome to do so.  

Packaging and arranging for these to be shipped via United Parcel Service, took several days, June 20 - July 2nd.  These steps are reflected in the TEXT messages between Santomauro and Mastoris.  

At this point, Santomauro is content to have retrieved his possessions.

TEXT - June 20, 25, 26 & July 1 - Michael Santomauro to Michael Mastoris regarding shipment of Santomauro's recovered property

While at the shore house packing up Santomauro's possessions Mastoris noticed paintings and other of his possessions were now missing.  He speculates Melvene Lynn Kennedy, acting for Charles, removed these and likely sold them to provide Charles with more money.

Mastoris asked his attorney about removing his possessions and about those items which were now missing.   This included several valued paintings and  his lawn mower.

Lincoln claimed these were his property, accusing Mastoris of having stolen them from the shore house, which he had stolen from Mastoris.

Disgusted with Lincoln's behavior, Mastoris decided to allow the bank for foreclose on the property and arranged to remove his personal property from the house.   

Lincoln protested this attempt, asserting Mastoris had no right to enter the shore house for any reason.  June 21, 2014 

More threats followed on June 29, 2014

A lawsuit and various ways to alleviate the harm done to by Lincoln are now in process.  See these emails to follow the action.  These also appear under Communications

 August 6, 2014 12.08 PM - Mastoris to Charlie Lincoln

August 6, 12:45PM - Lincoln to Mastoris, copy to Barry Frost 

August 9, 2014 6:47 PM - Charles Lincoln to Mastoris; Barry Frost cc: Melvene Lynn Kennedy, Peter Milano, Alan & Amy Martin

August 09, 2014 11:37 PM - Charles Lincoln to Mastoris, Barry Frost CC Melvene Lynn Kennedy

 August 11, 2014  6:42PM - Charles Lincoln to Peter, Melinda & Mastoris




Monday, August 11, 2014

August 09, 2014 6:47 PM - Charles Lincoln to Mastoris, Barry Frost CC Melvene Lynn Kennedy, Peter Milano, Alan & Amy Martin

From: Charles Edward Lincoln III [mailto:xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.com]  
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2014 6:47 PM
 To: Michael Mastoris; Barry Frost
 Cc: Melvene Lynn Kennedy; Peter Milano; Alan & Amy Martin 
Subject: Re: Mantaloking home

Michael:

You have absolutely no right, absent a court order to the contrary, to enter the home at XXXX  XXXXXXXXXXXXXX in Mantoloking.  We have been through all this several times already.  You are a trespasser every time you set foot anywhere near the place.   I will be filing the attached lawsuit next week to address this issue, in part (See Counts II and IV in particular).  

I wonder whether you would like to save time and money by waiving service of process through your attorney Barry W. Frost.  I copy this to Peter Milano and Alan J. Martin with the same question.

 I am sorry that you are forcing my hand on this issue.  I am almost heartbroken in fact.  But you show no judgment of any kind and no ethical fibre.   I suspected you were going to do something like this when I got your e-mail last Wednesday. I was just totally in denial about you for the longest time.  Melinda warned me.  Amalia warned me.  Lynn and I will jointly report your threat to the Mantoloking Police.  You have no right to disturb the peace.  You have no right to enter.  I will hire a special security guard if necessary.  

Lynn: I authorize you to start looking for guards to protect the place.  





Charles Edward Lincoln, III
"Ich bin der Geist der stets verneint, und das mit recht, 
denn alles was entsteht, Ist werth daß es zu Grunde geht."
Deo Vindice/Tierra Limpia
http://charleslincoln3.wordpress.com

August 6, 2014 12.08 PM - Mastoris to Charles Lincoln

From: Michael Mastoris [mailto:mnmdc@optonline.net]  
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 12:08 PM 
To: 'Charlie Lincoln' 
Subject: Mantaloking home

With my lawyer I am setting up an auction of all the contents of the shore home. I wanted you to know that. Michael  Since the banks have now been given permission to finalize the foreclosure, I need to get out all my possessions. Just to let you know Michael

TEXT - Michael Santomauro with Michael Mastoris June 20, 2014 - June 26, 2014 - July 1 & 2, 2014


Mastoris went to the Mantoloking home, which he has owned for 32 years, to recover the stolen items and ship these to Santomauro.  This was duly accomplished though shipping and other expenses came to around $500. 
The items were then packaged for shipping as supplies were available and Mastoris had time to do this.   Santomauro sent supplies, ordered from Amazon.  

The pick-up by UPS is arranged, the number of boxes, five, labeled.  Mastoris then contacts Santomauro to ensure all the boxes were received.

August 09, 2014 11:37 PM - Charles Lincoln to Mastoris, Barry Frost CC Melvene Lynn Kennedy

From: Charles Edward Lincoln III [mailto:xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.com]  
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2014 11:37 PM

To: Michael Mastoris; Barry Frost 
Cc: Melvene Lynn Kennedy
Subject: Re: Mantaloking home

Michael:

You will NOT be negotiating with Lynn on this.  Any negotiations you want to do will be with me.  Lynn will arrange the security guard and the police detail and will file a police report if you come anywhere close to the house or interfere in any way.  You are in NO WAY SHAPE OR FORM the "SOLE OWNER OF ALL OF THE CONTENTS"---and there will be no "eventual sale" of the home any time soon.

August 1, 2014 3.30AM - From Charles Lincoln to Alan & Amy Martin




-----Original Message----- 
From: Charles Edward Lincoln III [mailto:xxxxxx@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 1:30 AM 
To: Alan & Amy Martin; Alan Martin 
Subject: Courtesy copy of Motions to be filed in Law Division---Special Civil Part, Mercer County
Dear Mr. Alan J. Martin:
          I am asking that you agree voluntarily to dismiss your complaint against me, or else to amend it and refile it in a court of general jurisdiction, so that I may counterclaim against you appropriately.  
          I attach the documents I have prepared for filing.  It will save us both time and money if you will agree to a voluntary dismissal of your complaint against me filed in the Law Division of the Special Civil Part of the New Jersey Superior Court. If you cannot or will not agree to my motions, I will file these motions on Monday, prior to August 8, in addition to moving for a continuance of the hearing.   I was entitled to 35 days after the date of service on the Complaint, by New Jersey Law, and 35 days will not have elapsed from July 16, 2014, on August 8, 2014, so the date was improper to begin with.
          You appear to be suing for rescission of our February agreement for me to serve as your agent with Power of Attorney to negotiate with Wells Fargo, and to assign your rights to your home so that I can try to preserve them.  Your complaint shows a woeful misunderstanding of our agreement, as well as the fact that YOU are the party in breach.
           You have also joined and actively participated in a conspiracy against me, which makes me think of a famous New Orleans book you should read called, "A Confederacy of Dunces" (written by John Kennedy Toole, found, edited and posthumously published by Walker Percy, really it's an American Classic---if you haven't already read it).  But seriously, you, Michael Mastoris, "Bill R. Johnson," and William Todd Overcash and his minions do make a most amusing bunch of bungling burglars, fraudsters, tricksters, con-artists, and defamers, if you weren't violating a wide variety of laws and injuring me without justification in the process.
           Please make no mistake, I do intend to counterclaim against you as outlined in the three documents which I herein attach:
(1)     Answer
(2)    Motion to Dismiss (New Jersey Superior Form)
(3)    Verified Motion to Dismiss (Free form Motion).
           I have not yet prepared a Motion for Continuance on the grounds stated, in part because I expect your agreement.
           If we proceed with this case, and you force me to file a New Lawsuit or Counterclaim, I will be counterclaiming against you or suing you for $250,000.00 in damages plus costs of suit.
           I have taken a new job, but for the time being the 287 South Robertson Boulevard address is still the best by which to reach me.  I have an agent with durable power of attorney in New Jersey and I think she is a necessary party to this lawsuit, since it involves events taking place since she became my agent with power of attorney, including the burglary of xxx xxxxxx xxxxxx and the attempted assault and battery planned at the Trenton-Princeton airport between you, Mastoris, and Overcash.

Charles Edward Lincoln, III
"Ich bin der Geist der stets verneint, und das mit recht, 
denn alles was entsteht, Ist werth daß es zu Grunde geht."
Deo Vindice/Tierra Limpia
http://charleslincoln3.wordpress.com

August 11, 2014 6:42 PM - From xxxxxx to Charles, Peter, Melinda, Mastoris



XXXXXX


6:42 PM

to Charles, Peter, Melinda, Mastoris



Charles:

I am in receipt of your pleadings against Mr. Martin, Mr. Mastoris, Mr. and Mrs. Milano and the Storage facility.  I would advise you to leave my name out of your frivolous lawsuit, now and in the future.
Thank you,
XXXXXX

Tuesday, August 5, 2014

August 6, 2014 2014 12:45 PM - Charles Lincoln to Mastoris; Barry Frost

From: Charlie Lincoln [mailto:xxxxxxx@xx.comxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 12:45 PM
To: Mastoris; Barry Frost
Subject: RE: Mantaloking home

Dear Michael:

That's very interesting, and I thank you for your note, but does not match with what I have heard.  All I know is that the DB Trust Motion for Relief from.stay was granted.  

Please forward any papers you have indicating that "the banks" are moving forward with any foreclosure of either property.  I wrote to.Barbara Fein, the attorney for DB Trust directly.

Since you revoked my Power of Attorney, do you want me to contest 24 Hluchy or let it go?  I will seek to quiet title to Mantoloking regardless.  

As for personal property at Mantoloking, it seems to me you wasted some time stealing mine when you could have been collecting your own.  Are you sure that you are actually preparing for a foreclosure?  If so, exactly how?  I'd Barry just trying to make it extra easy for the Banks or what?

From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.

April 12, 2014 7:01 PM - Charles Lincoln to Michael Mastoris cc Mario Kenny

From: Charles Edward Lincoln III
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 7:01 PM 
To: Michael Mastoris
 Cc: Mario Kenny 
Subject: Is this Wells Fargo's Smoking Gun?

Dear Michael:
Well, This is VERY thick---but this may be what everyone has been talking about for the past four months as Wells Fargo's Smoking Gun---"The Document Recreation" Manual.  I would certainly be relevant in your case.  And even in your Bankruptcy Case.  I have not studied it thoroughly enough to see whether it really does outline procedures for falsifying notes or suggest such procedures---but if anyone (like Mario Kenny) has any information or perspectives, I would be grateful for feedback.  I wish that Don Black had not ditched us…. one way or another this is going to be powerful stuff….. And it's out there… somewhere… we just have to get our hands on it.

Charles Edward Lincoln, III
"Ich bin der Geist der stets verneint, und das mit recht, 
denn alles was entsteht, Ist werth daß es zu Grunde geht."
Deo Vindice/Tierra Limpia
http://charleslincoln3.wordpress.com

April 18, 2014 3:02 AM - Charles Lincoln to Michael Mastoris

From: Charlie Lincoln
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 3:02 AM 
To:  Mastoris
Subject: Third Email Since we talked

Dear Michael:
Please check and read your email.

Point Number One: I think you are being led into a trap. I sent you and Barry Frost two emails today. 

Point Number Two:  I have been starving and homeless in LA unable to work.  I left New Orleans because they kicked me out of St. CHARLES GUESTHOUSE where I was very happy. 

Point Number Three:
You need to send me lots more money for things to go smoothly.

What do you think I can do with $170?  That is two nights in a hotel plus a little medicine and a couple of decent meals.  I cannot live that way.  I cannot do anything under these circumstances. 


April 19, 2014 5:53 PM - Charles Lincoln to Patti Faulder, real estate agent cc Amalia Liana Thanou, Edward Villanueva, and GD

rom: Charles Edward Lincoln III [mailto:xxxxxxxxx@gmail.com]  
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 5:53 PM 
To: Patti Faulder 
Cc: Amalia Liana Thanou; Ed Villanueva; Edward Villanueva; G D
Subject: Re: 1717 Coliseum

Dear Patti:
A happy and Glorious Easter to you, (if you are one of the few who celebrate such things, as I am, with something other than bunnies and colored eggs)….  I am very interested in historical properties in New Orleans so I guess you are the right person to talk to.  I'm in Los Angeles, CA at the moment (Mailing address: 287 South Robertson Blvd., Beverly Hills 90211). 
I assume you would have forms on which to make or present a "backup" offer?  If so, please send them to me here by e-mail.  Glad you liked my voicemail message… some folks say it shows deep immaturity on my part….to which I say….did I ever promise anyone to grow up for real?





Charles Edward Lincoln, III
"Ich bin der Geist der stets verneint, und das mit recht, 
denn alles was entsteht, Ist werth daß es zu Grunde geht."
Deo Vindice/Tierra Limpia
http://charleslincoln3.wordpress.com

April 27, 2014 11:56 PM - Charles Lincoln to Melvene Lynn Kennedy

From: Charles Edward Lincoln III [mailto:xxxxxxx@gmail.com]  
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 11:56 PM 
To: Melvene Lynn Kennedy 
Cc: G D
 Subject: Revised Responses as to Requests Number 1, 3, 4 and 6

Dear Lynn:
Upon reflection I made several alterations to these responses in addition to the question you raised about 6 and its connexion to 3.

Charles Edward Lincoln, III
"Ich bin der Geist der stets verneint, und das mit recht, 
denn alles was entsteht, Ist werth daß es zu Grunde geht."
Deo Vindice/Tierra Limpia

February 02, 2014 12:51 PM - Charles Lincoln to Mastoris

From: Charlie Lincoln III
 Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 12:51 PM 
To:  Mastoris
Subject: CONTINUANCE OF HEARING PLUS $15,000 to reorganize the case with new lawyers and witneses

Happy Groundhog Day!  Still debating whether I should stretch myself out for Peter Milano-Ralph Nittolo or not---I have figured out I am going to need for you to advance me quite a bit more of your take on the tree farm than $5000.00.  I need to be nimble and quick to try to put together a team this fast.  We will surely need to continue the hearing on Valentine's Day.  You will need to give me at least $10k and maybe $15k.  Non-negotiable, just plan on it.  $15k.


From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.

February 04, 2014 4:34 PM - Charles Lincoln to Dara Bloom and Melinda Pillsbury-Foster - Charles responding interlinear, to email from Dara

From: Charles Edward Lincoln III [mailto:xxxxxx@rocketmail.com]  
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 4:34 PM
 To: Don Black; Melinda Pillsbury-Foster 
Subject: Re: Nittollo and Mastoris cases (interlinear response)

My Dear Don (part I)
You should be receiving an email from Judge Ferguson's court regarding the adjournment of the hearing until March 4th.  

I received the e-mail Notice from Judge Ferguson's chambers.  I had requested it yesterday, showing my frustrated travel plans, so I was expecting it.  I may yet have to drop that case, but I really wish you could get some perspective on things: I was trying to get you money from Peter Milano and you attacked me viciously for doing so, back in November, and then you said more recently that I am trying to shaft you?????  Does this sound as crazy to you as it does to me?

I have already spoken to Chris and we will be filing our joint motion to withdraw as soon as possible.

On the one hand it's good to make Chris earn his money.  On the other hand, I kind of wish you wouldn't.  I have told Peter Milano to stay away from me and he agreed to do so, so end of that problem.

I also explained the situation to Chris regarding the Mastoris hearing on the 14th.  He does not wish to be lead counsel in the matter and only agreed to be local counsel. 

I would not have Chris as Local counsel. He shows very little, if any, potential.

I will agree to remain lead counsel and arrive on the 14th provided I have been paid for my out-of-pocket expenses to date in the amount of $200.00 and if plane ticket is sent to me by Thursday, February 6th, otherwise, Chris and I will withdraw formally.  I really don't understand why you and Michael have tried to shaft me on $200.00.  Was all this worth it?


My Dear Don (Part II), 
I think that you need to turn the question you ask around and ask yourself, "Was all this worth it?"  
You owe me and Michael ten thousand apologies for saying we were trying to shaft you.  That is MY first condition of continuing negotiations with you.  Get some perspective, Girl---look at what I was trying to do.  Remember what our plan was.  Don't talk like a jungle bunny---NOBODY was trying to shaft you--we were trying to figure out how best to build you up and situation you.  And that is GOD'S TRUTH.

As of last Friday morning, I was fighting with Michael all morning to get you $10,000.00 SO THAT YOU COULD MOVE to MANTOLOKING AND START WORKING.  He had all but given up fighting me.  Now there are delays and problems with the sale of the Tree Farm so he is all despondent again.

You are going to have to decide whether you want to move to Mantoloking and start playing big league law or not.  Nemec still might pay some, Santomauro might pay some, but it is NOT insane, given how much you don't love your present job, for you just to move to New Jersey and start living in a beautiful house and working FOR ME FULL TIME.
All along, I have been working to get you taken care of.  Especially in light of the further delay's with Michael's financing, MY proposal is absolutely the only one that works: you live rent free at xxx xxxxxxx, Curtis Point, Mantoloking, New Jersey and you start working full time for me, at a rate of 50% of gross income or $10,000.00/month, whichever amount is less.  It is going to be less for the first few months, but there is always and will always be positive cash flow and you will be  soon.  That WAS our deal, and that is the only deal in which I am remotely interested, precisely because it is the only deal that would fairly and adequately compensate.  You wrote to Michael that you want to be paid, "like any other attorney" on a case-by-case basis?  That was never the deal. NOBODY has that kind of money.  We are not even asking for full-payment on the Homeowners' Justice Website---but I think we're asking for too much even then.  You have written to me about "business models"---well I never went to business school and I know precious little about "business models" but I have read Adam Smith and Karl Marx and I have some general notion about how markets work.  We tested out the market and we asked for too much money.  It was a realistic amount of money, but the White Middle Class of America is DRAINED---and the Hispanic Middle Class is pretty much supported by the government.  MY business proposal requires you to work full-time.  AND to be in a strategically valuable place---strategically valuable in THOUSANDS of ways.  The fact that you are fighting THIS is just unconscionable.  And slightly demented.  

Should you decide to go forth with me as counsel, we will need an agreement in writing regarding fees and expenses which will need to be fronted to me in the future.

The decision whether to go forward is 100% yours. Not mine. The written agreement I can give you is based on EXACTLY the model I specified above: you live in Mantoloking and you get 50% of our gross receipts and after that $10,000.00 plus rent free in Mantoloking---at which point you will be doing very well.  I want to reserve one small room by the garage as mine at Mantoloking and I want to have campaign parties and fund-raising events there.  I may make arrangements for those things whether you are there or not.  But wouldn't you like to be there?
Anyhow---think about whether you want to apologize to me for saying I was trying to shaft you, and whether I am not being extremely fair to you.  I know you are in a horribly stressful job right now, and so I make excuses for all the things that have gone wrong so far:
(1)   You did not understand the significance of the victory we won in prohibiting Reed Smith from appearing by means of that New Jersey Rule that permitted them voluntarily to appear without service or waiving service.  We needed more time---Michael needed more time---you won that point and then threw away your advance after the "Raccoon hunter" letter to Judge Lois H. Goodman.  You did not realize the value of that victory at all.  But Michael and I saw that you missed a major opportunity.  DID WE SAY ANYTHING AT THE TIME?  NO.
(2)     You utterly failed to get the twin Motions to Disqualify REED SMITH, LLP, set for hearing, even though you called the Court once at my request and they assured you (or at least, you assured me) that they had NOT in fact confused Magistrate Lois H. Goodman's ruling on the Lois H. Goodman informal letter with the formal Motion to be Presented to the Judge Sheridan). I begged you to call the Court regularly, but I know, you broke your foot on Thanksgiving Legos  and then the Court remanded the case……
(3)     At the final phone hearing with Judge Sheridan, Christopher McDonnell insisted that we reformat the Letter as an Amended and Supplemental Motion to get the APPLICATION FOR STAY OF FORECLOSURE before Judge Sheridan, and you did not discuss that matter with the Judge at all.  Do you think it might have saved Michael from going into Bankruptcy?  It might not have worked, but it might have.
In short, Don, I have cut you LOTS of slack because you're overwhelmed with your job and bad living situation in Santa Clarita.  You now say that you want to stay there and have more money but the situation will continue the same way?  AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN.  I need you full-time.  This project ail only work if you are full time.  I can't have you sleepwalking through this endeavor anymore.  I need you full time.  I need you as a partner. 50% of gross receipts aside from Mastoris IS partnership.  Mastoris would be allowing me to lease YOU the house in addition to paying ME for my living expenses.  
Basically, you have been offered one of the sweetest deals in history and you complain you are getting shafted over $200.00.  Did I mention that the phrase "totally demented perspective" comes to my mind when I think about the hissy fits you have been throwing?
Michael Mastoris and I are both, in different ways, struggling for our lives, at the levels of tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars.  I have been trying to give you a brand new life this way.  And you say you are "getting shafted" when there is a slight delay in you recovering your $200 spent on FedEx and Copying.  If you could not afford to advance those amounts, you could and should have waited to send them.  If you advanced those amounts out of your own pocket in the expectation that your salary and gross income plus benefits would far exceed $200, you were correct.  
The time has come for you to take responsibility for your own less than stellar actions, accept the fact that I have been supporting you and cutting you slack everywhere (1) because I like you personally, (2) because you and I share a very distinctive minority political viewpoint, and (3) because I know your current job and living situation is horrible and I think you deserve to get out of it.

Charles Edward Lincoln, III
"Ich bin der Geist der stets verneint, und das mit recht"
Deo Vindice/Tierra Limpia